Acquisitions and Divestitures
|
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions and Divestitures |
2. Acquisitions and Divestitures 2012 Acquisitions. See Note 13 for information on an acquisition completed subsequent to September 30, 2012. 2012 Divestitures. On May 15, 2012, we sold our 40%, non-operating working interest in the South Timbalier 41 field located in the Gulf of Mexico for $30.5 million, net, with an effective date of April 1, 2012. The transaction was structured as a like-kind exchange under the Internal Revenue Service Code (“IRC”) Section 1031 and other applicable regulations, with funds held by a qualified intermediary until replacement purchases could be executed. Funds remaining from this sale to be used for replacement purchases are reported in current assets as restricted cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2012. In connection with this sale, we reversed $4.0 million of asset retirement obligation (“ARO”). 2011 Acquisitions. On May 11, 2011, we completed the acquisition of approximately 24,500 gross acres (21,900 net acres) of oil and gas leasehold interests in the West Texas Permian Basin from Opal Resources LLC and Opal Resources Operating Company LLC (collectively, “Opal”) and, in 2011, we acquired minor amounts of undeveloped leasehold acreage in the related geography from another third party (collectively, with the properties acquired from Opal, the “Yellow Rose Properties”). The acquisitions were funded from cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving bank credit facility.
The following table presents the purchase price allocation for the acquisitions of the Yellow Rose Properties (in thousands):
On August 10, 2011, we completed the acquisition from Shell Offshore Inc. (“Shell”) of its 64.3% interest in the Fairway Field along with a like interest in the associated Yellowhammer gas treatment plant (collectively, the “Fairway Properties”). During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the purchase price was reduced by $2.7 million. The purchase price is subject to further post-effective date adjustments and final settlement is expected to occur in the first half of 2013. The acquisition was funded from borrowings under our revolving bank credit facility. The following table presents the purchase price allocation for the acquisition of the Fairway Properties (in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Yellow Rose Properties and the Fairway Properties accounted for $21.6 million of revenue, $8.8 million of direct operating expenses, $7.2 million of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion (“DD&A”) and $2.0 million of income taxes, resulting in $3.6 million of net income. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Yellow Rose Properties and the Fairway Properties accounted for $32.8 million of revenue, $10.7 million of direct operating expenses, $9.6 million of DD&A and $4.4 million of income taxes, resulting in $8.1 million of net income. Such amounts are for the period from each respective close date to September 30, 2011. The net income attributable to these properties does not reflect certain expenses, such as general and administrative expenses and interest expense; therefore, this information is not intended to report results as if these operations were managed on a stand-alone basis. In addition, the Yellow Rose Properties and the Fairway Properties are not recorded in a separate entity for tax purposes; therefore, income tax was estimated using the federal statutory tax rate. Expenses associated with acquisition activities and transition activities related to these acquisitions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses. Pro Forma Financial Information Pro forma financial information has been prepared due to the Yellow Rose Properties being significant. The Fairway Properties acquisition, which was not significant, was combined with the Yellow Rose Properties to disclose the effect of both acquisitions. The unaudited pro forma financial information was computed as if these two acquisitions had been completed on January 1, 2010. The historical financial information is derived from the unaudited historical consolidated financial statements of W&T and the unaudited historical statements of the sellers.
The pro forma adjustments were based on estimates by management and information believed to be directly related to the purchase of the Yellow Rose Properties and the Fairway Properties. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations had the acquisitions occurred on January 1, 2010. If the transactions had been in effect for the periods indicated, the results may have been substantially different. For example, we may have operated the assets differently than the sellers, realized sales prices may have been different and costs of operating the properties may have been different. The following table presents a summary of our pro forma condensed combined statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 (in thousands except earnings per share):
For this pro forma financial information, we assumed the transactions were financed with borrowings from the revolving bank credit facility because the cash and cash equivalents balances for the assumed acquisition date was less than the cash and cash equivalents on hand used on the actual closing dates of the two acquisitions. Also, we assumed that the revolving bank credit facility capacity would have been increased due to the increase in reserves. The following adjustments were made in the preparation of the condensed combined statement of income:
2011 Divestitures. There were no material divestitures completed during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. |